US v. Alcantara-Mendez, No. 06-2675 (unpublished). This is strange. A sex offender didn't register. His supervised release was violated. But, the District Court didn't say what the grounds were, but the First says it was was obvious. Every argument in the pro se brief is dealt with summarily, so it doesn't seem like they are taking it that seriously.
« CA1: franchise fight | Main | CA1: another chapter in Narragansett Indian Tribe lawsuit ends on procedural note »
September 24, 2008
The comments to this entry are closed.
Recent Posts
- Giving it up.
- CA1: large law firm loses case on behalf of client
- CA1: It’s official. Everything is mail fraud.
- CA1: no preemption where no conflict – just assistance
- CA1: Drinking and driving isn’t accepting responsibility
- Another thing the Victims Rights Industry is Silent About
- CA1: proper punishment for a stalker that refused to retain a lawyer before not paying taxes
- CA1: what to do about a shooting of a mentally ill person
- CA1: surprise! creating false invoices to defraud Uncle Sam is corrupt
- CA1: making non-lawyers step outside hotel rooms okay
Recent Comments
- Account Deleted on Giving it up.
- Account Deleted on Giving it up.
- Gary Neal on CA1: proper punishment for a stalker that refused to retain a lawyer before not paying taxes
- Account Deleted on Giving it up.
- Xbox360redring1 on Why Nieves-Castaño is wrong !
- Xbox360redring1 on Why Nieves-Castaño is wrong !
- Ting Wu on Public Comment Requested on electronic access:
- Sexy girl! on CA1: It’s official. Everything is mail fraud.
- Sexy girl! on CA1: It’s official. Everything is mail fraud.
- Sexy girl! on CA2: What the heck is going on in CA2 with coerced confessions
Categories
- AEDPA (104)
- Antitrust (10)
- Appellate Advocacy - Books & Articles (66)
- Appellate Advocacy - CLEs & Seminars (17)
- Appellate Advocacy - Tips (57)
- Appellate News (81)
- Appellate Procedure (178)
- Bankruptcy (88)
- Big Cases (152)
- Blawg Review (3)
- Booker (268)
- California Supreme Court (34)
- Civil - Jurisdiction & Removal (91)
- Civil - Liability (106)
- Civil Forfeiture (17)
- Civil Procedure (433)
- Constitutional Torts (1983, Bivens, RLUIPA) (262)
- Contracts (106)
- Criminal - Defenses (30)
- Criminal - Offenses (188)
- Criminal - Sentencing (550)
- Criminal Procedure (405)
- Eighth Circuit (28)
- Eleventh Circuit (131)
- Evidence (179)
- Fifth Circuit (349)
- First Circuit (1915)
- Fourth Circuit (21)
- General Torts (74)
- Immigration (358)
- Insurance (73)
- Labor & Employment (233)
- Legal Commentary (37)
- Ninth Circuit (104)
- Sanctions (52)
- Second Circuit (245)
- Securities (30)
- Seventh Circuit (27)
- Sixth Circuit (217)
- Sixth Circuit - Criminal (51)
- Tax Court (64)
- Tenth Circuit (6)
- Third Circuit (12)
Legal Blogs
- Abstract Appeal
- Alaskablawg
- Appellate.net
- Begging The Question
- Blawg Review
- Bradley Parker
- Crime & Federalism
- Criminal Appeal
- CrimLaw
- Election Law
- Ex Post
- Federal Civil Practice Bulletin
- Greedy Clerks
- How Appealing
- Juris Novus
- Life, Law, Libido
- Minor Wisdom
- On Appeal
- Puerto Rico Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
- SCOTUSBlog
- Sentencing Law and Policy
- Southern Appeal
- Statutory Construction Zone
- TaxProf Blog
- The 10b-5 Daily
- Underneath Their Robes
- Virginia Appellate News & Analysis
Comments