« CA1: AEDPA leads to another prosecutorial misconduct green light | Main | CA1: pro-Western Algerian has to go back »

August 15, 2008



The line before is just as good:

The elliptical phraseology employed by the IJ in this case, in which he termed the petitioner's testimony generally credible while making clear that he did not believe a specific portion of it (i.e., her claim of party membership), is confusing.

The comments to this entry are closed.