« CA1: prior inconsistent statements admissible, but error harmless | Main | Best comments »

March 04, 2008


Ted Frank

It's funny how I check into this blog for the first time in almost two years, and right away in the first post I read, you get the holding of a case 180 degrees wrong. I plainly haven't missed anything, and you're still plainly not reading (or, at least, understanding) the cases you're talking about.

The comments to this entry are closed.