« CA1: let’s get something straight: land use controversies usually lack constitutional dimensions | Main | CA1: Public Health Service is treated like other uniformed services for purposes of FTCA and Bivens »

January 31, 2008

Comments

KipEsquire

"I never understood why the Supreme Court has held that there is a substantive due process right to indoctrinate your kids into your own religion, because I think a general First Amendment [right] in choosing one's own religion is far greater than the interest in parents in ramming a religion down their kid's throats."

Or, in the case of infant male circumcision, ramming a religion up their kid's you-know-what.

The comments to this entry are closed.