« CA1: En banc court rejects state Indian Claims Settlement Act Arguments under the Indian Commerce Clause, with a constitutional feast |
Main
| CA1: nothing changes in guns and the commerce clause »
- The Rhode Island Supreme Court held that it is reversible error for hearsay to be admitted in a probation revocation hearing without specific findings of "good cause." This means that, at least in one state, the trite declaration that "hearsay is admissible" is an error fo law. From a quick read of the case State v. Bernard, it would seem that this, indeed, has applicability outside of the Ocean State. Thanks Rhode Island Law Journal.
- Some social worker said, "There is no exact science in psychology. There's a lot of experimental science, but as far as reaching conclusions, a lot of it you go to training, instinct, and -- mostly training." A trial court seemed to rely on that in resolving a child custody decision. The Mississippi Supreme Court held it was inadmissible under its version of Rule 702. Giannaris v. Giannaris. Thanks Blog702.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Comments