The sound of own horns tooting

A an alert reader provides the following:

• S. Brannon Latimer, Note: Due Process--habeas Review and Outside Influences on the Jury--the Ninth Circuit Holds That Buttons Depicting the Victim's Photo, Worn by Immediate Family During Murder Trial, Pose an Unacceptable Risk of Impermissible Influence on the Jury under Clearly Established Law,  59 SMU L. Rev. 395, n. a1 (2006) (“I would also like to thank the authors of Appellate Law & Practice, http://appellate.typepad.com, a legal blog which first brought this case to my attention”)
• Roger Clegg, George T. Conway III, Kenneth K. Lee, The Bullet and the Ballot? The Case for Felon Disenfranchisement Statutes, 14 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 1, 3 & n. 6 (2006) (“Legal observers again expect a very close vote, noting that the Second Circuit en banc panel had previously split five-five on this very same issue in 1996. See, e.g., Posting of Happy Fun Lawyer to Appellate Law & Practice (noting the 5-5 split in Baker v. Pataki, 85 F.3d 919 (2d Cir. 1996) (en banc)), http://appellate.typepad.com/appellate/2004/12/index.html (Dec. 30, 2004, 9:15 EST))
• Brian R. Gallini, Emily Q. Shults,  Herding Bullfrogs Towards a More Balanced Wheelbarrow: an Illustrative Recommendation for Federal Sentencing Post-Booker, 33 J. Legis. 1 (2006) (“See also As the Sixth Circuit Booker World Turns, Appellate Law & Practice Blog, (Feb. 17, 2005), http://appellate.typepad.com/appellate/2005/02/as_the_sixth_ci.html#more/”)