« CA5 calculating good time | Main | CA11: a long and (if I may be so bold) muddled opinion about standing »

April 08, 2005


Anonymous Clerk

FYI the title of this post and the summary contained here & on the front page of the site is incorrect, if you read the docket entries closely. The Sixth Circuit did NOT grant en banc in this case. Having not been granted en banc rehearing, the petition for rehearing was referred to the panel, who then, on their own, vacated their opinion.

The comments to this entry are closed.