« CA1: A strange Booker remand because the wrong version of the guidelines was used | Main | CA1: No negligence, no relevance, no 1983 »

April 05, 2005

Comments

SF Attorney

I wonder if the defendant has a right to go back before the state court judge to ask for some kind of modification of the 17-year sentence. Granted, 30 vs. 47 years, depending on the age of the defendant, may be a meaningless distinction, but still, this just seems wrong.

The comments to this entry are closed.