CA1: Nothing to see here. Keep moving.

(or so said Judge Kozinski...)
Two unpublished opinions today from the first.

 

Duffy v. England, No. 04-2122 affirms the dismissal of an age discrimination claim on timelyness grounds, noting that “We have held that in cases where, as here, an ADEA claimant elects to bypass the administrative process and goes directly to federal court, the applicable limitations period is two years from the date of the allegedly discriminatory act or practice. Rossiter v. Potter, 357 F.3d 26, 34 (1st Cir. 2004).”

US v. Terrefort-Quidgley, No. 04-2085, refuses to address any Blakely issues because they were not raised below, but remands to allows the government to dismiss a charge as contemplated in the plea agreement.

Cimon v. Gaffney, No. 04-1631, appears again.  See our coverage here.