Sinurat v. Mukasey, No. 07-2230 (8/8/08) denies the asylum petition of a Christian protestant. The IJ and BIA found no connection between a beating and government oppression. He says the agency ignored his argument. The First says they did not.
« CA1: a further remand for time-served and parsimony issues | Main | I just got a “hot hope injection.” »
August 09, 2008
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2ca353ef00e553f4b0948834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference CA1: Indonesian Christian not oppressed :
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Recent Posts
- Giving it up.
- CA1: large law firm loses case on behalf of client
- CA1: It’s official. Everything is mail fraud.
- CA1: no preemption where no conflict – just assistance
- CA1: Drinking and driving isn’t accepting responsibility
- Another thing the Victims Rights Industry is Silent About
- CA1: proper punishment for a stalker that refused to retain a lawyer before not paying taxes
- CA1: what to do about a shooting of a mentally ill person
- CA1: surprise! creating false invoices to defraud Uncle Sam is corrupt
- CA1: making non-lawyers step outside hotel rooms okay
Recent Comments
- www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1042759516 on CA5
- www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1042759516 on CA5
- twitter.com/SeanWilson09 on Giving it up.
- mary petruno on Giving it up.
- John O'Sullivan on Appellate Politics and qualified immunity: The 11th shows its stupidity in hiding its activism
- John O'Sullivan on Giving it up.
- Alexander Zeno on CA1: First really bends to affirm a disciplinary proceeding
- lucas law center on CA1: large law firm loses case on behalf of client
- JOHN on CA1: declaratory judgments not that preclusive
- michael phillips on CA11: Voting Rights Act and disenfranchisement of ex-felons
Categories
- AEDPA
- Antitrust
- Appellate Advocacy - Books & Articles
- Appellate Advocacy - CLEs & Seminars
- Appellate Advocacy - Tips
- Appellate News
- Appellate Procedure
- Bankruptcy
- Big Cases
- Blawg Review
- Booker
- California Supreme Court
- Civil - Jurisdiction & Removal
- Civil - Liability
- Civil Forfeiture
- Civil Procedure
- Constitutional Torts (1983, Bivens, RLUIPA)
- Contracts
- Criminal - Defenses
- Criminal - Offenses
- Criminal - Sentencing
- Criminal Procedure
- Eighth Circuit
- Eleventh Circuit
- Evidence
- Fifth Circuit
- First Circuit
- Fourth Circuit
- General Torts
- Immigration
- Insurance
- Labor & Employment
- Legal Commentary
- Ninth Circuit
- Sanctions
- Second Circuit
- Securities
- Seventh Circuit
- Sixth Circuit
- Sixth Circuit - Criminal
- Tax Court
- Tenth Circuit
- Third Circuit
Legal Blogs
- Abstract Appeal
- Alaskablawg
- Appellate.net
- Begging The Question
- Blawg Review
- Bradley Parker
- Crime & Federalism
- Criminal Appeal
- CrimLaw
- Election Law
- Ex Post
- Federal Civil Practice Bulletin
- Greedy Clerks
- How Appealing
- Juris Novus
- Life, Law, Libido
- Minor Wisdom
- On Appeal
- Puerto Rico Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
- SCOTUSBlog
- Sentencing Law and Policy
- Southern Appeal
- Statutory Construction Zone
- TaxProf Blog
- The 10b-5 Daily
- Underneath Their Robes
- Virginia Appellate News & Analysis
Comments