« How I help YOU read this blog | Main | CA1: First says Gall doesn’t change much. »
Denmark v. Liberty Life, No. 05-2877. The First dismisses a petition for rehearing en banc as moot, because the Supreme Court in MetLife v. Glenn, No. 06-923 (June 19, 2008), seems to have rejected the First’s view on standards of review in ERISA cases where the administrator has a conflict. The parties now have to brief how Glenn changes things. The First's original opinion is here and our coverage of that is here.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2ca353ef00e5539e12e88834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference CA1: More briefing in Denmark v. Liberty Life:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments