CA1: cut and paste brief goes nowhere

Rusli v. Gonzales, No. 06-1941 (6/27/08) (unpublished) summarily denies a petition for review by Indonesian Christian.  It begins with this line: The brief filed by petitioners' counsel, Yan Wang, is a "cut and paste" affair that appears to present the facts of another case -- notably for a person of a different gender than Rusli, who had different experiences, in different years, and appeared before a different immigration judge. This substantive failure to comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28 alone justifies dismissal. And there were no arguments.