CA1: mea culpa on “cache” case

Commentator “zephaniah” has read US v. Morales Aldahondo, No. 06-2533 (our coverage here), and convinced me to a 90% probability (enough to send someone to jail) that I was wrong.  (Despite claiming to use words precisely, the First employed a rather ambiguous term “cache” which is a computer term of art.) This was not an “images stored in a browser cache” case, but a “hoard” case.  Therefore, a lot of my anger at the First was misplaced.