« CA1: a normal restart of questioning Miranda problem | Main | CA1: Gillette’s alleged shaving in ERISA plan upheld »

April 16, 2008

CA1: required findings of fact in a bench trial

Torres Lazarini v. US, No. 06-2634 is an affirmance of an FTCA/Medical Malpractice case (resolved by a bench trial) against the VA which is governed by Puerto Rican substantive law.

The big issues seem to be whether the District Court improperly considered prior lawsuits as evidence of the defendant’s character.  The First says that the findings of fact by the judge didn’t bear that out.  Likewise, under FRCP 52(a)  failure to mention one expert wasn’t fatal to the judge’s findings of fact, because it is “clear” that the District Court was really crediting one expert over another.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/210928/28183086

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference CA1: required findings of fact in a bench trial:

Comments

Post a comment

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

Recent Comments