CA1: ERISA, the ADA and pro ses

Femino v. NFA Corporation, Nos. 07-2178, 07-2179 (unpublished).  This is a pro se ERISA case.  I guess I could just stop there.  However, the reasoning is more of a civ pro issue. The First says that the issue is precluded by earlier actions. 

She also raised an ADA claim, which was that a limitation on benefits to people with self-reported symptoms had a disproportionate impact, but she could only muster evidence from her own case.