« CA1: Puerto Rican political discrimination claim fails | Main | CA1: Puerto Ricans’ can’t get no relief for the commonwealth’s woes »
US v. Cardona-Diaz, No. 06-2315. A guy was arrested. He plead guilty and executed an appeal waiver. The government agreed to recommend a sentence of 87 months. The District Court said that the parties “agreed” on such a sentence. Nobody objected to this characterization. The First says that this is “troubling” but it isn’t a “miscarriage of justice” under United States v. Teeter, 257 F.3d 14, 23 (1st Cir. 2001).
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2ca353ef00e551f25ae98834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference CA1: District Court misunderstanding plea agreement wasn’t that bad:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments