CA1: dismissal for want of prosecution affirmed

Gulla v. Dennehy, No. 07-1936 (unpublished).  Case was dismissed for want of prosecution after District Court gave a prisoner a few changes to amend his complaint.  The plaintiff claims that he was “incapacitated” during the time period in question, the First does not buy it.  I wonder why they said they “carefully” considered the arguments made, when there is no indication that they even addressed his arguments point by point.