« CA1: even though some in the government might agree with the defendant, the jury can still convict | Main | CA1: two drug shipments – on fake – turns into sentencing mess »

March 27, 2008

Art at the First Circuit

Turns out most people don’t like the First Circuit’s taste.  ArtBistro reports

A panel of prominent artists, architects, attorneys, and judges, including US Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer, picked [Ellsworth] Kelly – an 84-year-old Upstate New York artist whose work is displayed all over the world – from a pool of applicants to create something to enliven the new brick-and-glass courthouse rising above Boston harbor....

the fiberglass-and-aluminum panels are among the most valuable works of art in Boston by a living artist, commissioned at a cost of $800,000 in tax dollars, and probably worth millions today. The revelation usually leaves visitors to the John Joseph Moakley courthouse incredulous or bemused.

Whether one likes modern art or not, Kelly’s panels add a dash of cheer. As one court officer standing near the courthouse entrance put it, “It’s nice to have some paintings here, because there’s so much sadness. There’s a lot of people going to jail.”

At least that one unnamed court officer got it right.  Courts are about sending people to jail, and usually people are sad when, upon application of someone that went to law school, someone is sent to a government-sponsored hole.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/210928/27510904

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Art at the First Circuit:

» Questions from A Stitch in Haste
--Is it a proper function of government to spend $800,000 in taxpayer money on abstract art for a courthouse? ("This is a gorgeous building, and every time I... [Read More]

Comments

Post a comment

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.