« CA1: no duty to defend against environmental suit as home heating oil is a pollutant | Main | At least she is honest about not taking defendant’s arguments seriously »

January 18, 2008

CA1: flashing signs really can’t get no respect

Naser Jewelers, Inc. v. City of Concord, No. 07-2098.  Do you know what an Electronic Messaging Center ("EMC") is?  Well, it is an electric sign whose content changes.  The city thinks it is distracting to drivers. So, they ban it.  The plaintiffs think that such a ban interferes with their freedom of speech.  The First says it is content neutral and “narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental interest and leaves open alternative channels of communication.”

Sure, this is a neat issue of constitutional law, but I seriously doubt that anyone really thinks that a jeweler has a right to use one of those annoying signs.  My only fear is that the First might have written some bad language about deferring on some issues to legislators. 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/210928/25266536

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference CA1: flashing signs really can’t get no respect :

Comments

Post a comment

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

Recent Comments