« CA2: Can courts sua sponte consider an above-guideline sentence? And can guidelines/standing orders contradict the Fed. R. Crim. P? | Main | CA1: Reading denied in Fontes -- but 1st raises suspension clause issue with REAL ID Act. »
Prawfsblawg, not only cited our post, but is holding a “bad legal arguments” contest, complete with rules.
After they get some results, I was going to see if people could post the worst judicial decision of the year. But, this wouldn’t mean “bad resolution of identified legal ambiguous legal issues” but rather “mistakenly overlooked binding precedent or statute.”
Anyway, I digress. Go to Prawfsblawg.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2ca353ef00e39827f8618833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bad legal argument contest:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments