« CA9: an agent provocateur tale | Main | CA1: the arbitrator did a good enough job »

June 07, 2007

CA1: E&O for brokers doesn't cover business decisions

Massamont Ins. v. Utica Mutual Ins. Co., No. 06-2465.  Today’s first case seems quite interesting, but is described with far more detail then is necessary.  In short, under what the First thinks is Massachusetts law, professional “Errors and Omissions” insurance (in this case for an insurance broker) doesn’t cover business decisions, which, in this case was a breach of an exclusivity agreement that resulted in an arbitration award.  Or, in the words of the First, “A promise by an agent to represent one insurer exclusively for certain lines of insurance is not itself a professional service, nor does a diversion of business in breach of such a contract comprise the performance of professional service. The closest cases interpreting Massachusetts insurance law hold that overcharging clients in fees, even though for work done in a professional capacity, is not itself a professional service covered by malpractice or E&O policies.”  Finally, regarding an unfair trade claim, the court notes that delay doesn't matter, because "Delays in resolving the coverage question are also charged but, given that Utica had no duty to defend, Massamont had to explain why delay alone increased its defense costs and this it has not done."

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/210928/19132814

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference CA1: E&O for brokers doesn't cover business decisions:

» The First Circuit on Professional Liability Insurance from Boston ERISA Law Blog
What SCOTUSBLOG does for the Supreme Court - maintaining a steady and running review of goings on at the high court - Appellate Law and Practice does for the First Circuit, only with a little more humor and quirkiness than... [Read More]

Comments

Post a comment

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

Recent Comments