US v. Medina, No. 06-2142 (unpublished). The first time this case was here, it got a Booker remand. See the case here, and our coverage here. As you know, there is a mandatory minimum involving “crack cocaine” in 18 U.S.C. § 841. The earlier case held that “21 U.S.C. § 841 regulates exactly what it's terms suggest: the possession of any form of 'cocaine base'.” But, the First applies the “law of the case” doctrine, and says that the earlier decision applies, and there is no manifestly injustice, nor is it obviously wrong.