US v. Ciampi, No. 03-2461, concludes, on habeas, that contrary to what the petitioner says, he “***knowingly and voluntarily waived the right to appeal or collaterally challenge his illegal gambling conviction by entering into a written plea agreement with the government.” The court discusses the changes in plea colloquy procedure brought on by the amendments to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c). He also loses some AEDPA relation-back arguments.