« CA11: a lawyer's nightmare, in a Title VII setting | Main | Another California opinion re: revival of a limitations statute in a punitive damage claim and the Ex Post Facto Clause »

May 16, 2005

Let the wine flow

The Scotusblog notes that the court has bought the Dormant Commerce Clause arguments in Granholm v. Held.  The court writes:

We  hold  that  the  laws  in  both  States  discriminate  against interstate commerce in violation of the Commerce  Clause,  Art. I,  §8,  cl.  3,  and  that  the  discrimination  is  neither  authorized  nor  permitted  by  the  Twenty-first  Amendment.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2ca353ef00d835110ef153ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Let the wine flow:

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment